Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement
Rik van Riel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:09:01 -0200 (BRDT)
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:47:39PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Not really. Under very high VFS loads we'd just scan
> > through the list twice and free the entries anyway.
> You're obviously wrong.
> The higher was the load, the faster your working set was getting
> dropped from the dcache. (with the patch the working set will
> have a chance to remains in cache also with polluting going on
> The example with only pollution in the cache doesn't make sense,
Ever heard of slocate / updatedb ?
Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
Trailer at 11.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/