Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

David C. Davies (davies@maniac.ultranet.com)
Sat, 06 Jan 2001 21:14:38 -0500


--------------080100040707010804040708
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All,

Please reply to daviesrallis@mediaone.net rather than this email account.

Regards,

Dave
------------------------------------

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
>> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
>> always MTU sized skbuffs.
>
>
> One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
> that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
>
> Jeff
>
>

--------------080100040707010804040708
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All,

Please reply to daviesrallis@mediaone.net rather than this email account.

Regards,

Dave
------------------------------------

Jeff Garzik wrote:

Andi Kleen wrote:
de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
always MTU sized skbuffs.

One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.

Jeff



--------------080100040707010804040708-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/