Re: ds patch

Dan Aloni (karrde@callisto.yi.org)
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:30:17 +0200 (IST)


On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Thiago Rondon wrote:

> Check kmalloc().

In case where kmalloc() failed we shouldn't increase driver->use_count,
because we wouldn't be able to decrease it at unbind_request(), since we
got no matching socket_bind_t in the list.

Prehaps the increase of the use count should be moved after the
check. Like:

--- linux/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c Sat Sep 2 10:13:49 2000
+++ linux/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c Wed Jan 10 23:23:10 2001
@@ -412,8 +412,11 @@
}

/* Add binding to list for this socket */
- driver->use_count++;
b = kmalloc(sizeof(socket_bind_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!b)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ driver->use_count++;
b->driver = driver;
b->function = bind_info->function;
b->instance = NULL;


> -Thiago Rondon
>
> --- linux-2.4.0-ac5/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c Sat Sep 2 04:13:49 2000
> +++ linux-2.4.0-ac5.maluco/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c Wed Jan 10 16:20:53 2001
> @@ -414,6 +414,8 @@
> /* Add binding to list for this socket */
> driver->use_count++;
> b = kmalloc(sizeof(socket_bind_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!b)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> b->driver = driver;
> b->function = bind_info->function;
> b->instance = NULL;

-- 
Dan Aloni 
dax@karrde.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/