Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks
Andi Kleen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:58:23 +0100
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:23:05PM -0500, Bill Hartner wrote:
> Mike K, wrote :
> > If the above is accurate, then I am wondering what would be a
> > good scheduler benchmark for these low task count situations.
> > I could undo the optimizations in sys_sched_yield() (for testing
> > purposes only!), and run the existing benchmarks. Can anyone
> > suggest a better solution?
> Hacking sys_sched_yield is one way around it.
How about process pairs that bounce around tokens in pipes ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/