> Stephen Satchell wrote:
> [lots of good advice deleted]
> > One goal of language designers is to REMOVE the need for comments. With a
> > good fourth-generation or fifth-generation language, the need for comments
> > diminishes to a detailed description of the data sets and any highly
> > unusual operations or transforms on the data.
> This is but a dream. You can't "design out" the need for comments by
> approaching natural language. Try reading a law book and realize that
> natural language too may be twisted to the extent that it needs
> extensive comments. The same goes for any computer language powerful
> enough to do useful work.
Actually using natural language and other such constructs may INCREASE the
need for comments.
For more examples, see Perl.
email@example.com | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply
Alan Olsen | to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys.
"In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/