Re: Renaming lost+found

[H. Peter Anvin]

Followup to:  <[e-mail]>
By author:    Thunder from the hill <[e-mail]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
> You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
> system without a lost+found is a lot worse.
> 

Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
*renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck &c) use "/lost+found" by name,
or by inode?  As far as I know it always uses the same inode number
(11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced.

	-hpa

-- 
<[e-mail]> at work, <[e-mail]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt