Re: PCI IRQ routing problem in 2.4.0

Tim Hockin (thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu)
Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:11:13 -0600 (CST)


> > Device 00:01.0 (slot 0): ISA bridge
> > INTA: link 0x01, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
> > INTB: link 0x02, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
> > INTC: link 0x03, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
> > INTD: link 0x04, irq mask 0x1eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12]
>
> Your "link" values are in the range 1-4. Which makes perfect sense, but
> that's absolutely _not_ what the Linux SiS routing code expects (the code
> seems to expect them to be ASCII 'A' - 'D').

In reading the PIRQ specs, and making it work for our board, I thought
about this. PIRQ states that link is chipset-dependant. No chipset that I
have seen specifies what link should be. So, as this case demonstrates, it
may be 'A' - the value the chipset expects, or 1, the logical index.
Either one makes sense, assuming the PIRQ routing code knows what link
means. Here we see two BIOS vendors/versions that apparently do it
differently for the same chipset. Grrr.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/