Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR)

Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:08:40 +0100


On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:31:36PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> The important thing is that the tunnel is destroyed and recreated (it
> has to be, it is over different underlying link addresses). I do not
> want that to destroy the connections from the tunnelled address.

Just do not set IFF_DYNAMIC on the tunnel interface then, that is why it is a
flag and not hardcoded.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/