Re: bidirectional named pipe?
H. Peter Anvin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
8 Feb 2001 15:10:08 -0800
Followup to: <3A81D5B4.9CBC9B0D@kasey.umkc.edu>
By author: "David L. Nicol" <email@example.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> How hard would it be to add? The limitation on fifos that you get the same
> one every time you open it makes some things tricky -- the server has to
> move the fifo and mkfifo a new one to replace its data with something else,
> for instance, which is not atomic.
> I don't understand, in the original problem, how the server opens
> the named bipipe differently from the servers, to be on one end rather than
> the other.
> A way to map a file name to a socket pair would be nice, the first to open
> it could get one end of it and everyone else would get the other end, or there
> would be a switch.
> You could patch the file system code, I wonder how deep the changes would have
> to be, if you did it in terms of lots of fifos.
I would really like it if open() on a socket would be the same thing
to connect to a socket as a client. I don't think it's a good idea to
do that for the server side, though, since it would have to know about
<firstname.lastname@example.org> at work, <email@example.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/