Re: 2.4.2-pre3 compile error in 6pack.c

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:30:30 +0000 (GMT)


> > Would it be costly/reasonable to have kmalloc -not- panic if given a
> > too-large size? Principle of Least Surprises says it should return NULL
> > at the very least.
>
> It's on purpose; to find the erroneous drivers.

Unfortunately Linus forgot to provide a way to check if a kmalloc is too
large so the drivers cannot work around it. Dave put an incredibly ugly
constant assumption in af_unix for this and no doubt more will follow.

So -ac added the constant

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/