Re: [OT] Major Clock Drift
Andrew Morton (email@example.com)
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:38:35 +1100
Alan Cox wrote:
> > > queued_writes=1;
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > }
> > Unfortunately, that means that if machine crashes in interrupt, it may
> > "loose" printk message. That is considered bad (tm).
> The alternative is that the machine clock slides continually and the machine
> is unusable. This is considered even worse by most people
Neither. I was going to dust off my enhanced "bust_spinlocks"
patch which sets a little flag when we're doing an
oops, BUG(), panic() or die(). If the flag
is set, printk() just punches through the lock.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/