Re: plugging in 2.4. Does it work?

[Peter T. Breuer]

"A month of sundays ago Jens Axboe wrote:"
> On Wed, Feb 21 2001, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > Hurrr ... are you saying that the buffers in the bh's in the request are
> > not contiguous?  My reading of the make_request code in 2.2 was that
> > they were!  Has that changed?  There is now a reference to an elevator
> > algorithm in the code, and I can't make out the effect by looking ... 
> > I have been copying the buffer in the request as though it were a single
> > contigous whole.  If that is not the case, then yes, bang would happen.
> 
> Nothing has changed in this regard at all between 2.2 and 2.4. The
> buffers are guaranteed to be sequentially sector-wise, but definitely
> not contigious in memory!

I recall that in 2.2 the make_request code tested that the
buffers were contiguous in memory. From 2.2.18:

                        /* Can we add it to the end of this request? */
                        if (back) {
                                if (req->bhtail->b_data + req->bhtail->b_size
                                    != bh->b_data) {
                                        if (req->nr_segments < max_segments)
                                                req->nr_segments++;
                                        else break;
                                }

It looks to me like it tested that the b_data char* pointers of the
two requests being considered are exactly distant by the declared
size of one.

Is that no longer the case? If so, that's my answer.

Peter