Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's

[Andi Kleen]

Chris Mason <[e-mail]> writes:

> filemap_fdatawait, filemap_fdatasync, and fsync_inode_buffers all restrict
> their scans to a list of dirty buffers for that specific file.  Only
> file_fsync goes through all the dirty buffers on the device, and the ext2
> fsync path never calls file_fsync.
> 
> Or am I missing something?

If the filesystems tested had blocksize < PAGE_SIZE the fsync would try
to sync everything, not walk the dirty buffers directly.
So e.g. if one of the file systems tested was generated with old ext2 utils
that do not use 4K block size then some performance difference could be 
explained.

-Andi