Re: spinlock help

Nigel Gamble (nigel@nrg.org)
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:53:45 -0800 (PST)


On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
> 1. when spin_lock_irqsave() function is called the subsequent code is
> executed untill spin_unloc_irqrestore()is called. is this right?

Yes. The protected code will not be interrupted, or simultaneously
executed by another CPU.

> 2. is this sequence valid?
> spin_lock_irqsave(a,b);
> spin_lock_irqsave(c,d);

Yes, as long as it is followed by:

spin_unlock_irqrestore(c, d);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(a, b);

Nigel Gamble nigel@nrg.org
Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/