> IIRC, when this discussion of swap size first came up, the general
> conclusion was NOT that you should have swap = 2 * RAM, but that you
> should have swap(2.4.x) = 2 * swap(2.2.x), that is, twice as much swap
> as you did under 2.2.x.
it seems to me that in 2.2.x it looks like this:
total usage == swap + RAM
under 2.4.x it looks like:
total usage == swap
> So if you never swapped at all under 2.2.x, you should not need any
> swap space in 2.4.x either.
Right.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/