Re: [OOPS] report

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 01:03:20 -0500 (EST)


On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Chris Mason wrote:

> > I suspect that the right fix is to drop the ->s_lock bogosity along with
> > sys_sync() call in panic()...
>
> Ok, I was more talking about the ugliness that is reiserfs_panic (how many
> times do we need a commented out for(;;)?). For panic() calling sys_sync,
> I think there non-filesystem related panics where we do want to sync.

panic doesn't sync if called from interrupt (thanks $DEITY).
It is pointless to sync during boot.
sync from driver panic is not better than one from fs.

What does it leave? I hadn't checked each panic(), but it seems that
if we ever want syncing upon panic() it's safer to do sys_sync() by
hands before calling panic(). If it is actually ever needed, that is.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/