> Sorry. Who said it should not be tested? How else it could get
> 'default compiler'? If the gcc-3.0 would start giving errors
> on some old code then it could be gcc bug. But this rwsem code
> is couple of days old. It is good to let it through stricter
> error checking, I guess. This rwsem is very in-flux code. eg.
> 2.4.4-pre2 did not compile. ac[56] with um-arch do not compile.
For what its worth, I got the same error on 2.4.3-ac5, using gcc 2.91.66.
I did seem messages fly by in on the list about a few in -ac5, but
haven't gone back to dig them out.
-- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/