Re: MO-Drive under 2.4.3
Alan Cox (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sun, 22 Apr 2001 00:59:44 +0100 (BST)
> a) Put in lots of bigblock special case code in FAT;
> b) teach submit_bh() or generic_make_request() to transparently reblock
> bhs < hw_blksize and remove most special cases from FAT. Specifically,
> it ought to stop pretending in sb->s_blocksize to use 2k blocks when
> the fs is really tied to 512 byte blocks.
> I tend to favour b), but which one is more likely to be accepted?
Al Viro suggested c) which was to transparently make it a loopback mount of
the raw device and let a loopback layer do the work.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/