Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit
Hugh Dickins (email@example.com)
Fri, 27 Apr 2001 23:40:40 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, LA Walsh wrote:
> > An interesting option (though with less-than-stellar performance
> > characteristics) would be a dynamically expanding swapfile. If you're
> > going to be hit with swap penalties, it may be useful to not have to
> > pre-reserve something you only hit once in a great while.
> This makes amazingly little sense since you'd still need to
> pre-reserve the disk space the swapfile grows into.
It makes roughly the same sense as over-committing memory.
Both are useful, both are unreliable.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/