Re: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules?

mirabilos (eccesys@topmail.de)
Wed, 9 May 2001 18:58:47 -0000

> If the free software community understood and accepted this, by the
way,
> then I think that it removes the need for the LGPL, it's redundant.

What is when compiling a DOS/DJGPP programme? IIRC it is statically
linked
to the libc-dos. IIRC the LGPL here prevents the remaining DOS programme
code
to be GPL'ed too.

I'm neither a lawyer, but this is the difference as I understood.
Please correct me if I am wrong.

-mirabilos

--
EA F0 FF 00 F0 #$@%CARRIER LOST


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/