Re: [PATCH] allocation looping + kswapd CPU cycles

Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br)
Thu, 10 May 2001 15:49:05 -0300 (BRT)


On Thu, 10 May 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:22:57PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > Initially I thought about __GFP_FAIL to be used by writeout routines which
> > want to cluster pages until they can allocate memory without causing any
> > pressure to the system. Something like this:
> >
> > while ((page = alloc_page(GFP_FAIL))
> > add_page_to_cluster(page);
> > write_cluster();
>
> Isn't that an orthogonal decision? You can use __GFP_FAIL with or
> without __GFP_WAIT or __GFP_IO, whichever is appropriate.

Correct.

Back to the main discussion --- I guess we could make __GFP_FAIL (with
__GFP_WAIT set :)) allocations actually fail if "try_to_free_pages()" does
not make any progress (ie returns zero). But maybe thats a bit too
extreme.

What do you think?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/