Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory
H. Peter Anvin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
14 May 2001 17:25:18 -0700
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
By author: Rik van Riel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote:
> > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to
> > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best
> > > performance...
> > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported
> > by the 4GB option?
> Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;)
It seems obvious once you know why the limits are there. The 1 GB
limit (actually 1024-128 MB = 896 MB) is a software limit; the 4 GB
and 64 GB limits are hardware limits and are exact.
IMO we should rename the 1 GB option!
<email@example.com> at work, <firstname.lastname@example.org> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/