is this fault tolerance? I think if a CPU croaks, you are dead.
There are patches for hot swap cpu support, but I haven't seen any CPU
fault tolerance patches that can handle a dead processor
> * Dynamic Memory Resilience
RAM fault tolerance? There was a patch a long time ago which detected
bad ram, and would mark those memory clusters as unuseable at boot.
However that is clearly not dynamic.
If your memory croaks, your kernel will experience random corruptions
> * Dynamic Page Sizing
> * Live Upgrade
LOBOS will let one Linux kernel boot another, but that requires a boot
step, so it is not a live upgrade. so, no, afaik
> * Alternative I/O Pathing
be less vague
> * HSM
patches exist, I believe
> * TCP selective acknowledgement (SACK)
> * Service Location Protocol (SLP)
> * ATM IP switching
yes, I believe
> * SOCKS 5 support
yes, via userspace apps/libs
> * Multilink PPP
> * TCP/IP Gratuitous ARP (RFC 2002)
> * Path MTU Discovery (RFC 1191)
> * Path MTU Discovery over UDP
not sure, but I think so
> * IP Multipath Routing
> The questions I have about the features above are:
> * Are any of the above features implemented in the
> kernel? If yes, where can I read (url-link to the
> article, paper... please) about it?
-- Jeff Garzik | Disbelief, that's why you fail. Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/