could you port your patches to the 2.4.5-ac4 kernel? I'd love to see if the ac
improvements and yours add to each other.
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, May 29 2001, Fabio Riccardi wrote:
> > "Leeuw van der, Tim" wrote:
> > > But the claim was that 2.4.5-ac2 is faster than 2.4.5 plain, so which
> > > changes are in 2.4.5-ac2 that would make it faster than 2.4.5 plain? Also, I
> > > don't know if 2.4.5-ac1 is as fast as 2.4.5-ac2 for Fabio. If not, then it's
> > > a change in the 2.4.5-ac2 changelog. If it is as fast, it is one of the
> > > changes in the 2.4.5-ac1 changelog.
> > 2.4.5-ac1 crashed on my machine, vanilla 2.4.5 worked but slower than 2.4.2
> > 2.4.5-ac2 is _a lot_ faster than all the 2.4.4 and of vanilla 2.4.5
> > please notice that I have a 4G machine, dual proc, and I run a very
> > memory/IO/CPU intensive test, so your mileage may vary with different
> > applications.
> Could you try the 4GB I/O patches and see if they boost performance of
> such cases?
> Jens Axboe
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to email@example.com
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/