The motherboard has VIA-chipset.
What does this mean for me?
Will the APIC-problems be solved in the future or do I have to deside upon
running "noapic" semi-crippled or not run Ultra-DMA?
_\\|//_
(-0-0-)
/-------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo------------------------------\
| Magnus Sandberg Email: Magnus.Sandberg@bluelabs.se |
| Network Engineer, Bluelabs http://www.bluelabs.se/ |
| Phone: +46-8-470 2155 (FAX: +46-8-470 2199) GSM: +46-708-225 805 |
\------------------------------------------------------------------------/
|| ||
ooO Ooo
----- On 1st of June 2001 Andre Hedrick wrote; -----
If this is a VIA SMP system there are APIC problems that you do not want
to even think about addressing.
MPS1.1 and passing "noapic" will fix most of there mess, but you have a
semi-crippled system, but it runs.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 Magnus.Sandberg@bluelabs.se wrote:
> Hi once more...
>
> I'm sorry for the layout of this mail. It is written in a web mail
> system...
> The attachements are in ASCII format even if the web-mail make it base-64
>
> Now I have compiled a vanilla 2.2.19 kernel and have SMP working, without
> Ultra-DMA. I used the functional kernel config from 2.2.19-ide and just
> activated SMP.
>
> >From that I have 3 very simular kernel configurations:
> 2.2.19 with Hidrick's IDE-patch, no SMP: working
> 2.2.19 without IDE-patch, with SMP: working
> 2.2.19 with IDE-patch and SMP: not booting
>
> With all the information I hope that someone can help me with the
> IDE-and-SMP problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/