Re: EXT2 Filesystem permissions (bug)?

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
25 Jun 2001 14:42:50 -0700


Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106251729450.18996-100000@coredump.sh0n.net>
By author: Shawn Starr <spstarr@sh0n.net>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Is this a bug or something thats undocumented somewhere?
>
> d--------T
> and
> drwSrwSrwT
>
> are these special bits? I'm not aware of +S and +T
>

It's neither a bug nor undocumented.

"info ls" would have told you the following:

The permissions listed are similar to symbolic mode
specifications
(*note Symbolic Modes::.). But `ls' combines multiple bits into
the third character of each set of permissions as follows:
`s'
If the setuid or setgid bit and the corresponding executable
bit are both set.

`S'
If the setuid or setgid bit is set but the corresponding
executable bit is not set.

`t'
If the sticky bit and the other-executable bit are both set.

`T'
If the sticky bit is set but the other-executable bit is not
set.

`x'
If the executable bit is set and none of the above apply.

`-'
Otherwise.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/