Re: [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions

Geert Uytterhoeven (geert@linux-m68k.org)
Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:27:46 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, David Howells wrote:
> * It should make drivers easier to write: they don't have to worry about
> whether a resource refers to memory or to I/O or to something more exotic.
>
> * It makes some drivers more flexible. For example, the ne2k-pci driver has
> to be set at _compile_ time to use _either_ I/O ports _or_ memory. It'd
> make Linux installation more better if _both_ were supported.
>
> * It'd allow some drivers to be massively cleaned up (serial.c).

And the IDE driver.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org


In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/