On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > What I want to say (I could be wrong and that can't surprise me) is
> > that the original cpuid_eax is in fact incorrect. All cpuid_XXX funcs
> > use only dummy output operands...
> >
>
> Bullsh*t. One of the output operands is always a non-dummy (in
> cpuid_edx() edx is not a dummy, for example.)
Right, and it is may be not damaged. In my first posting I
claim that cpuid_eax damages ebx (and may be ecx and edx).
> -hpa
Regards
-- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/