Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.
Andrea Arcangeli (email@example.com)
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:31:45 +0200
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 05:05:00AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Rusty Russell writes:
> > In message <20010723013416.B23517@athlon.random> you write:
> > > What kernel are you looking at? There's no such code in 2.4.7, the only
> > Oh, so it's only a trap *waiting* to happen. That's OK then!
> > Why not fix all the cases? Why have this wierd secret rule that
> > cpu_raise_softirq() should not be called with irqs disabled?
> Why keep it secret? I think Andrea is exactly right here, and we
> should just comment this restriction. That's all.
there's not such restriction as far I can tell (see my previous email
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/