Re: [PATCH] parport_pc.c PnP BIOS sanity check

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:20:34 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: vr sp: "http:// www.bigmx.com - Free Email Service , Communities and More..."
Previous message: Tom Rini: "Re: BUG: Assertion failure with ext3-0.95 for 2.4.7"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [PATCH] parport_pc.c PnP BIOS sanity check"
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [PATCH] parport_pc.c PnP BIOS sanity check"

> The following would seem to be required to protect against
> the case in which PnP BIOS reports an IRQ of 0 for a
> parport with disabled IRQ. // Thomas jdthood_AT_yahoo.co.uk

IRQ 0 is a legal valid IRQ. I suspect the problem is that pnpbios shouldnt
be reporting an IRQ or we should be using some kind of NO_IRQ cookie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: vr sp: "http:// www.bigmx.com - Free Email Service , Communities and More..."
Previous message: Tom Rini: "Re: BUG: Assertion failure with ext3-0.95 for 2.4.7"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [PATCH] parport_pc.c PnP BIOS sanity check"
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [PATCH] parport_pc.c PnP BIOS sanity check"