Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scalable Scheduling

[Linus Torvalds]

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Hubertus Franke wrote:
>
> Linus, great input on the FLAME side, criticism accepted :-)
>
> More importantly, we wanted to get some input (particular from you)
> on whether our approach is actually an acceptable one, not
> withstanding the #ifdef's :-),

I think what the code itself tried to do looked reasonable, but it was so
distracting to read the patch that I can't make any really intelligent
comments about it.

The only thing that looked really ugly was that real-time runqueue thing.
Does it _really_ have to be done that way?

		Linus