Re: I/O very slow under 2.4 (device reading)

©[@ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Luc Lalonde (pcg@goof.com)
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 04:34:31 +0200


On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:12:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
> and the VM disagree about how/when to allocate memory. It's fixed by the patch
> I'll make a real pre-patch (2.4.8-pre7) with the full changeset, can you

after 10 gigs of reading:

procs memory swap io system cpu
r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
0 1 0 0 6828 372696 36340 0 0 48292 6 726 2188 0 25 75
0 1 0 0 6880 370536 39352 0 0 33792 0 726 3725 1 37 62
1 0 1 0 6880 370160 36340 0 0 25652 48 411 3374 1 82 17
0 1 0 0 6628 370780 36288 0 0 44788 0 690 2071 1 31 68
1 0 1 0 6832 372972 36264 0 0 41988 0 674 2933 0 42 57

the system still feels a bit sluggishly, but otherwise NO SIGN of that
problem (no io slowdown, no short freezes). just the usual "disks are
in-use" contentions.

cool ,)

> at a nice stable 21MB/s which is all my disk can deliver.

you _should_ know that raw speed doesn't mean too much.

> [ Damn, maybe I should get one of those nice big 7200 rpm IBM drives ]

maybe noisier. and for some reason (I swear for ibm drives usually), they
keep getting uncorrectable media errors on all of my machines.. ;) still
they are the best ones available ;)

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@goof.com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/