(no subject)

>Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from hera.kernel.org (IDENT:[e-mail] [209.10.217.83])
	by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id EAA05315
	for <[e-mail]>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 04:23:16 +0900
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hera.kernel.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA04306
	for autofs-list; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:51 -0800
Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [213.95.15.193])
	by hera.kernel.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04303
	for <[e-mail]>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:50 -0800
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 35C5A1E2E1; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:15:49 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:48:16 +0100
From: Olaf Hering <[e-mail]>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <[e-mail]>,
  [e-mail], [e-mail]
Subject: Re: race in autofs / nfs
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>; from [e-mail] on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:38:47AM -0800
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk
Status: O
Content-Length: 779
Lines: 31

On Mon, Feb 12, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Olaf Hering wrote:
> > 
> > The autofs4.o is the culprit, it works perfect with autofs.o.
> > 
> > What would happen if I stick with autofs.o now?
> > The docu recommends autofs4 in modules.conf.
> > 
> 
> I don't know who came up with that idea.  You should use the module that
> matches your daemon, and not try to hack around so that there is a
> module/daemon mismatch.

cantaloupe:~ # /usr/sbin/automount -v 
Linux automount version 4.0.0

We had 4.0pre7 in 7.0 and 4.0pre9 in 7.1.
I would really like to know _where_ it hangs, Trond sent me a printk
patch but this one was not called. 
I will try to get a i386 SMP machine to see if its ppc specific.

Gruss Olaf

-- 
 $ man clone

BUGS
       Main feature not yet implemented...