Re: strange gcc crashes...
Nicholas Knight (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 05:56:06 -0700
On Monday 13 August 2001 04:55 am, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> at Aug 11, 01 06:51:15 PM +0000 Mark Hahn wrote:
> >> so it seems to me like kernel problem...
> >why is that? I've never seen a sig11 from production >code
> >that wasn't caused by flakey ram. in fact, your >descriptions
> >are a perfect example of similar hardware problems.
> and some other people told me about cpu overheating...
> but 55 minutes long memtest run showed no problems et al
> with cpu (P166-nonMMX-oc`ed to 180) staying warm, not by any means hot
> on mobo Zida 5DVX.
> maybe 55 min is not enough for proper mem testing?
Synthetic tests are never as good as a real good gcc run, I'd *never*
trust them over the indications given by attempting to compile the kernel
or something big like XFree86.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/