Re: [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O
Jens Axboe (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:52:27 +0200
On Wed, Aug 15 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <email@example.com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:10:52 +0200
> On Wed, Aug 15 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> > The only truly problematic area is the alt_address thing.
> > It is would be a nice thing to rip this eyesore out of the scsi
> > layer anyways.
> The SCSI issue was exactly what was on my mind, and is indeed the reason
> why I didn't go all the way and did a complete conversion there. The
> SCSI layer is _not_ very clean in this regard, didn't exactly enjoy this
> part of the work...
> I just took a quick look at this, and I think I can make this
> alt_address thing into a scsi-layer-specific mechanism and
> thus be able to safely remove it from struct scatterlist.
> Would you like me to whip up such a set of changes? I'll be
> more than happy to work on it.
Yes please, that'd be great.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/