Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)

Mark Hahn (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:01:13 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Martin Mares: "Re: problem with includes: pc_keyb.h"
Previous message: Anders Peter Fugmann: "Re: [PATCH] const initdata."
In reply to: Denis Perchine: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"

> But having Python just to configure a kernel is an overkill. Why not Sather, or other rarely used language.
> Oberon-2 would be also nice.

obviously, Prolog would be The Right Thing for doing kernel dependencies.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Mares: "Re: problem with includes: pc_keyb.h"
Previous message: Anders Peter Fugmann: "Re: [PATCH] const initdata."
In reply to: Denis Perchine: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"