Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed
Daniel Phillips (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sun, 2 Sep 2001 19:44:15 +0200
On September 2, 2001 07:19 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote:
> I think Daniel's two patches are the wrong way around. IE
> the second (labelled as the first) is the instrumentation
> to differentiate between different kinds of failure, and
> the first (labelled as the second) is the attempt to
> reserve extra pages for atomic allocations to reduce
> 0-order failures.
Yes, indeed - cut & paste error.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/