Re: Cramfs Endianness

Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Sun, 30 Sep 2001 22:05:23 +0200


Hi!

> Although the documentation states that always going with little endian is
> the easiest solution and what was "decided" on, neither the kernel nor
> mkcramfs swabs on a big endian machine. This is decidedly a problem with
> what we're doing, so I wrote a patch to swab the easy and not-quite-so-easy
> bitfields such that mkcramfs writes little endian images and the kernel
> swabs (if byteorder is defined as big_endian or __MIPSEB__ is defined)..
> It looks at the magic to determine whether to swab or not.
>
> We've needed this, so we will have to incorporate this into a parallel
> repository if not added to the kernel. Is there another solution afoot,
> or might I submit this patch? (please cc me if you respond)

Just submit the patch.

Pavel
...whose mips box is fortunately
little endian...

-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/