Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?

Samium Gromoff (_deepfire@mail.ru)
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 19:15:46 +0400 (MSD)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: andersg@0x63.nu: "mount D-states on secound mount"
Previous message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Getting system time in kernel.."
In reply to: Robert Szentmihalyi: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"

" Robert Szentmihalyi wrote:"
>
> > > Can you describe, or point to a description of your tests?
> >
> > Cerberus is the main one I run. It provides suprisingly effective
> > testing for load triggered bugs
>
> Samium Gromoff said he ran Cerberus over 2.4.10 and it did quite
> well
Yes i did, that was 11+ hours, but i`m not quite sure its long enough...
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: andersg@0x63.nu: "mount D-states on secound mount"
Previous message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Getting system time in kernel.."
In reply to: Robert Szentmihalyi: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"