In article <Pine.GSO.firstname.lastname@example.org> you wrote:
> Moreover, ->release() for block_device also doesn't care for the junk
> we pass - it only uses inode->i_rdev. In all cases. And I'd rather
> see it them as
> int (*open)(struct block_device *bdev, int flags, int mode);
> int (*release)(struct block_device *bdev);
> int (*check_media_change)(struct block_device *bdev);
> int (*revalidate)(struct block_device *bdev);
> - that would make more sense than the current variant. They are block_device
> methods, not file or inode ones, after all.
How about starting 2.5 with that patch ones 2.4.11 is done? Linus?
-- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/