I'm alluding to the fact that we need a place to put in-development patches.
> As a general disclaimer, i really dont mean to put down Ingo's efforts i
> just think the irq mitigation idea as is now is wrong for both 2.4 and 2.5
What is your solution to the problem? Leaving it up to the driver authors
doesn't work as they're not perfect. Yes, drivers should attempt to do a
good job at irq mitigation, but sometimes a safety net is needed.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/