Thomas Hood [jdthood@mail.com] wrote:
> I guess the question is: Which way is more portable? Is
> "(unsigned long)-1" liable to turn out as something other than
> ~0U?
>=20
> If your way of expressing it is more portable then we should
> make the change ... BOTH in pnp_bios.c and in parport_pc.c .
>=20
> Opinions?
unsigned long is 64-bits on 64-bit archs, and so (unsigned long)-1 will be
different than on intel...
I think that's ~0UL?
Maybe this is why I can't get pnp stuff to work on my alpha?
Cheers,
-- Bob
Bob McElrath (rsmcelrath@students.wisc.edu)=20
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics
--4LFBTxd4L5NLO6ly
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjvFshIACgkQjwioWRGe9K1eagCg9ZCtB56y2uqO395UB2auoyoF
j9MAoOInVjPJKEZhulZV/miQ3z5Nzup1
=DfLD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4LFBTxd4L5NLO6ly--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/