Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists
Linus Torvalds (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 19:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> The problem is that even if cpu1 schedule the load of p before the
> load of *p and cpu2 does a = 1; wmb(); p = &a; , it could happen that
> even if from cpu2 the invalidation stream exit in order, cpu1 could see
> the value of p before the value of *p due a reordering done by the
> cache controller delivering the stream to cpu1.
Umm - if that happens, your cache controller isn't honouring the wmb(),
and you have problems quite regardless of any load ordering on _any_ CPU.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/