Well, I dont actually need anything thats provided in 2.4 thats not provide=
d in 2.2. I tend to use standard hardware. Would 2.2 be a better choice?
On 13-Oct-2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hmm, it seems that I didnt realize I had to cc that to the list, becaus=
e I =3D
> > belive this is something that should be on the list.
> > Anyhow, exactly how much tweeking did you do, and isnt the ac tree supp=
> > to be unstable?
> The -ac patches vary in stability. The release announcement for each one =
> intended to be a guide to how stable I expect it to be.
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || firstname.lastname@example.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/