> So, your point is? :-) A sensible sending application, and a sensible
> TCP should not being setting PSH every single segment. And we're not
> coding up hacks to make the Linux receiver handle this case better.
> You'll have much better luck convincing us to implement ECN black hole
> workarounds :-)
Ignoring PSH completely on RX would probably not be a worse heuristic
than forcing an ACK on it. At least other stacks seem to do fine too
without the force-ack-on-psh. I think you added it a long time ago, but
I do not remember why you did it; but at least here is an counter example
now that may be a good case for a reconsider.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/