Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)
David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:04:34 -0400
If the hash table was grown dynamically, I wouldn't have this complaint.
It's too expensive to implement. It adds a new check every
connection, _or_ some timer which periodically scans the chain
lengths.
Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"
- Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated)"