Re: [PATCH] random.c bugfix

Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:58:28 -0600 (CST)


On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Horst von Brand wrote:

> Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com> said:
>
> [...]
>
> > (*) I don't know enough about the hash functions to know how to add a
> > few odd bytes into the store in a useful and safe way. We don't
> > really want to discard them either - think if a user-space random
> > daemon on an otherwise entropy-free system only writes one byte at
> > a time...
>
> I'm no expert either, but padding with anything (zeroes?) to get the right
> length should be safe, no?

No. A 4-byte accumulator is the right answer. We have to be careful here
though - the actual entropy might be in the partial words, we have to
account for it conservatively.

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/