Re: Nasty suprise with uptime

Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:28:09 -0800


On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:20:02PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:31:12PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> > > Say it ain't so! maybe I'm a bit dense, but is the 2.4 kernel also going
> > > to wrap around after 497 days uptime? I'd be glad if someone would
> > > point out the error in my understanding.
> >
> > Ahh, so that's why there haven't been any reports of higher uptimes... ;)
>
> Yes, it all makes sense now -
>

Just imagine the headline:

Kernel 2.6 now allows uptimes higher than 1.47 years!

_Click_Here_

*Click*

.........

The change was origionally included in 2.5.4, which was origionally known as
2.4.14...

;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/