Re: khttpd vs tux

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:45:29 +0100 (CET)


> tux holds all records, khttpd has been measured to be slower than some
> userspace webservers.

What's bad about tux, then? There usually is something...

roy

---
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/