Re: [PATCH] remove last references to linux/malloc.h
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:57:31 -0800
Morten Helgesen wrote:
> Hey David.
> I see your point - but someone has obiously decided to switch from malloc.h to slab.h, and I do not
> see the point in having three references to malloc.h when malloc.h only prints a warning and then includes
> == Morten
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:54:29PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > firstname.lastname@example.org said:
> > > Ok people - stop submitting patches which include malloc.h. Include
> > > slab.h instead. :)
> > Bah. I was sort of hoping we'd come to our collective senses and switch
> > them all back.
> > What does malloc.h do? Stuff to do with memory allocation, one presumes.
> > What does slab.h do? Some random implementation detail that people have no
> > business knowing about.
Too bad someone decided to change. I agree with David.
malloc.h is just too plain obvious, I suppose.
slab.h is only an implementation detail.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/